Special Needs Clients

In clients with special needs, Felo et al. compared 0.06% CHX irrigation with the subgingival tip to 0.12% CHX rinsing on subjects with at least two implants, over a three-month period. Results showed that 0.06% CHX irrigation was superior to rinsing in terms of PI, 29% vs. 9%, MGI, 45% vs. 10%, and CI with irrigation showing a 42% decrease and rinsing a 22% increase. There were no adverse effects to the implants from the use of the device.55